Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Summit Coal Co. v. Walker

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 25, 1926No. 6 Div. 496PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The Compensation Act (Code 1923, §§ 7534r-7597) has been liberally construed in the meeting of the evils sought to be remedied. Ex parte W. T. Smith Lbr. Co., 90 So. 807, 206 Ala. 485; Ex parte L. & N. R. Co., 94 So. 289, 208 Ala. 216; Ex parte Central Iron & Coal Co., 95 So. 472, 209 Ala. 22; Ex parte Majestic Coal Co., 93 So. 728, 208 Ala. S6.

If there is any reasonable view of the evidence that will support the conclusion announced by the trial court, the finding and judgment will not be disturbed. Ex parte De Bardeleben Coal Co., 103 So. 548, 212 Ala. 533; Ex parte Sloss-Sheffield S. & I.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Greek v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  2. Ex Parte Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  3. Ex Parte ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  4. Ex Parte Majestic Coal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  5. Ex Parte W. T. Smith Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1921

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mobile Liners, Inc. v. McConnellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  2. Matter of Petition of Sheffield Farms Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  3. Kelly v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  4. Woodward Iron Co. v. VinesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  5. J. H. Arnold & Co. v. JordanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API