Legal Opinion

Solnick v. Ballard

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 18, 1928No. 2 Div. 928PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

The bill of exceptions does not show any attempt to except to the general charge of the court. Following the general charge, the record shows that Mr. Erohlich Stated:

“We object to that part of your honor’s charge which refers to the plaintiff owing no duty to the man behind or to look behind, on the ground that the undisputed evidence shows this to have been a state highway and very many cars on the road.”

This is not in the bill of exceptions, and no exception to the oral charge is attempted to be shown therein. '

The bill of exceptions is the only proper place to show an exception. By law an…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. B'ham Ry. L. & P. Co. v. CockrumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  2. Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  3. Ex Parte CowartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  4. Liverpool London Globe Ins. Co. v. McCreeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  5. Conway v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McLaney v. TurnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  2. National Surety Co. v. BooneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Adams v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1940
  4. All States Life Ins. Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  5. Horace v. VanBlariconSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API