Legal Opinion

Bell v. Hartman

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1980No. WCB 76-6895 CA 14475 and SC 26802PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLinde, J.

Claimant, a licensed jockey, was injured in a fall during a race at Portland Meadows Race Track. Pursuing a possible recovery under the Workers’ Compensation Law, ORS 656.001 - 656.794, he made claims against a number of alleged employers and the State Accident Insurance Fund, including the registered and the actual owners of the horse, its trainer, the owner of the track, and the Oregon Racing Commission, on the theory that one or more of them were his employers for purposes of coverage under the act. After a hearing, a referee found that claimant was an independent contractor and not an…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Weller v. Union Carbide Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Woody v. WaibelOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Sahnow v. FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Bowser v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Jones v. Emanuel HospitalOregon Supreme Court · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Day v. Advanced M & D Sales, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Trabosh v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. Martelli v. RA Chambers and AssociatesOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Myers v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  5. Matter of Compensation of LangstonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API