Legal Opinion

Bowser v. State Industrial Accident Commission

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1947PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WINSLOW, J., (Pro Tempore).

This is an appeal from a judgment of the circuit court of the State of Oregon for Multnomah County determining that respondent, Ed C. Bowser, was an employee of McDonough Logging Company at the time he received certain injuries and that he is, therefore, entitled to compensation under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, hereafter referred to as the Act.

Respondent was a log hauler furnishing his own truck and hauling logs for the company at stated prices per thousand. He was hauling for the company from their logging show in “Cod’s Valley,” on the north…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. SilkSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Powell v. Construction Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Press Publishing Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Tuttle v. Embury-Martin Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Murray's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1931

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Woody v. WaibelOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Nordling v. JohnstonOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Sharp v. Hoerner Waldorf Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State Highway Commission v. KendrickOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Edward Slayman v. Fedex Ground Package SystemCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API