Legal Opinion

Sanford v. City of Detroit

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 21, 1985No. Docket 78049PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appeals as of right from the trial court’s April 18, 1984, order granting *197defendant’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing plaintiffs action.

Plaintiff alleged that she was sexually assaulted on March 3, 1979, in an abandoned factory building owned by defendant. Her assailant took her to that location. Plaintiff further alleged:

"5. That it was then and there that the duty and responsibility of the Defendant to maintain their premises in such a manner and in such a condition so as to not endanger the Plaintiffs and similarly situated person’s [sic] health, safety, and welfare.
"6.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rosario v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Armstrong v. Ross TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. McKee v. Department of TransportationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Keiswetter v. City of PetoskeyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hadfield v. Oakland County Drain CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Keeney v. Town of Old SaybrookSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  3. Wagner v. Regency Inn Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Roberts v. PinkinsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Zyskowski v. HabelmannMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API