Legal Opinion

Keeney v. Town of Old Saybrook

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 21, 1996No. 15205PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.

The principal issue in this appeal is whether the department of environmental protection (department) appropriately directed a town to construct a regional wastewater treatment facility in order to abate long-standing local pollution of the Connecticut River. The plaintiff, Timothy R. E. Keeney, commissioner of environmental protection (commissioner), brought suit in eight counts for declaratory and injunctive relief and for civil penalties against the defendant, the town of Old Saybrook, for allegedly violating four orders to abate pollution, and consequently violating General Statutes §§…

2Cases cited65 opinions

  1. Cheshire Mortgage Service, Inc. v. MontesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  2. Edmead v. McGuireNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Hoffman v. City of BristolSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  4. Hamm v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  5. Lukas v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Elliott v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. Pestey v. CushmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  3. Ventres v. Goodspeed Airport, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  4. Unkelbach v. McNarySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  5. Hunte v. BlumenthalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API