Legal Opinion

Wagner v. Regency Inn Corp.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 5, 1990No. Docket 116216, 116217PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, J.

Defendant Consolidex Corporation, doing business as Americar Rental Systems, appeals by leave granted from the trial court’s denial of its motion for summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(8) and (C)(10), on plaintiffs claims for nuisance per se and nuisance in fact. Americar also appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary disposition in favor of defendant Regency Inn Corporation on its cross-claim against Americar for indemnification. Defendant Regency Inn cross appeals from the trial court’s denial of summary disposition on plaintiffs nuisance claims. We affirm.

On October 25, 1985,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Williams v. Cunningham Drug Stores, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Buckeye Union Fire Insurance v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
  3. St Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. QuintanaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Peterfish v. FrantzMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Mills v. White Castle System, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Cloverleaf Car Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Lamp v. ReynoldsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Paul v. BogleMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Olden v. LaFarge Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
  5. Holland v. LiedelMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API