Legal Opinion

Hadfield v. Oakland County Drain Commissioner

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1988No. Docket Nos. 75494, 76815, 77011, 78233, (Calendar Nos. 2-5)PublishedCited by 128 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrickley, J.

These four consolidated cases present the issue whether a nuisance exception to governmental immunity remains viable after this Court’s decision in Ross v Consumers Power Co (On Rehearing), 420 Mich 567; 363 NW2d 641 (1984), and, if so, in what form. Consideration of this question necessitates review of two pre-Ross decisions in which this Court was divided over the proper scope of the nuisance exception. See Rosario v City of Lansing, 403 Mich 124; 268 NW2d 230 (1978); Gerzeski v Dep’t of State Hwys, 403 Mich 149; 268 NW2d 525 (1978). There are also *145three minor issues that are resolved in…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Ross v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Williams v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Abel v. Eli Lilly & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Bush v. Oscoda Area SchoolsMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Lockaby v. Wayne CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 1979

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by128 opinions

  1. Pohutski v. City of Allen ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Zelig v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Rowland v. Washtenaw County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Peterman v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Adkins v. Thomas Solvent Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992

123 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API