Legal Opinion
Larobina v. McDonald
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 12, 2005No. SC 17263PublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SULLIVAN, C. J.
The plaintiff, Vincent P. Larobina, appearing pro se, brought a four count amended complaint against the defendants, Andrew McDonald, Peter Olson, Pullman and Comley, LLC (Pullman), and First Union National Bank (First Union), alleging abuse of process (count one), civil conspiracy (counts two and *396three) and negligent infliction of emotional distress (count four). The trial court granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment as to all counts, and the plaintiff appeals from the judgment rendered thereon.1 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The record reveals…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Carrol v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Campfield v. Stickman, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Haynes v. Yale-New Haven HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Rivera v. Double A Transportation, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- Ventres v. Goodspeed Airport, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Miles v. City of HartfordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- GMAC Mortgage, LLC v. FordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Tanasi v. CitiMortgage, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2017
- State v. RoweSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.