Legal Opinion

Dillman v. Foster

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1982No. 17457PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Justice:

The plaintiffs in this case appeal from an adverse judgment in their action to quiet title to some real property described as Lots 2 and 3, Block 4, Pick-up Addition in the city of Roosevelt. Earl and Lejeune Dill-man (“plaintiffs”) filed suit in 1978 against Herbert and Frances Foster, George and Kathryn Mangan, and Omni and Carma Winterton. On May 2, 1980, a pretrial order was filed in which the parties stipulated that since the initiation of the suit, the *976Fosters and Wintertons had quitclaimed any interest in the property to the Mangans (“defendants”). The Fosters and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Scott v. HansenUtah Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Frederiksen v. LaFleurUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Ash v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Free v. FarnworthUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Crofts v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Marchant v. Park CityUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Anderson v. FautinUtah Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Marchant v. Park CityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  4. Buchanan v. HansenUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Cammon Consultants Corp. v. DayCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API