Legal Opinion

Marchant v. Park City

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided March 13, 1989No. 880131-CAPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before DAVIDSON, GREENWOOD and ORME, JJ. GREENWOOD, Judge:

Appellants challenge the trial court’s ruling that they did not have vested title to certain real property in Park City and thus were not entitled to recover damages for destruction of- the home on the property. Appellants claim that they have title to the property through adverse possession, deeds or alternatively, that their use was prescriptive. Accordingly, they claim entitlement to $20,000 in damages for the destruction of the residence on the property. We affirm.

In August of 1981, Park City issued a demolition permit to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Scharf v. BMG Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1985
  2. James v. PrestonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987
  3. Morris v. BluntUtah Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Crane v. CraneUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  5. North Union Canal Company v. NewellUtah Supreme Court · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lunt v. LanceCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2008
  2. Marchant v. Park CityUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Call v. City of West JordanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  4. Essential Botanical Farms, LC v. KayUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Nyman v. Anchor Development, L.L.C.Utah Supreme Court · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API