Ash v. State
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MAUGHAN, Justice:
Plaintiffs, as fee owners, initiated a quiet title action against the state to a described parcel of land. Specifically, plaintiffs alleged the state asserted a right adverse to plaintiffs’ fee title ownership in the westerly 40 feet of their parcel and that the state’s claim was wrongly asserted. The state responded that the area in dispute had been taken in an eminent domain proceeding from plaintiffs’ grantors, the Fidlers. Upon trial to the court, the title to the property as described in the conveyance to plaintiffs was quieted in them. The state appeals. We affirm.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sweetser v. FoxUtah Supreme Court · 1913
- Viersen v. BoettcherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- Scott v. HansenUtah Supreme Court · 1966
- County of Orange v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1971
- Babcock v. DangerfieldUtah Supreme Court · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Olwell v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 1982
- Waite v. Utah Labor Comm'nUtah Supreme Court · 2017
- Dillman v. FosterUtah Supreme Court · 1982
- Thomas v. HillyardUtah Supreme Court · 2019
- WDIS v. Hi-CountryUtah Supreme Court · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.