Cammon Consultants Corp. v. Day
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HATHAWAY, Judge.
This appeal is taken from the trial court’s granting of summary judgment for defendants/appellees in a tax lien foreclosure action. Summary judgment is proper when only one inference can be drawn from the facts and the moving party is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law. Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. Moore, 156 Ariz. 184, 750 P.2d 1387 (App.1988). We view the facts in the light most favorable to appellant. Ferree v. City of Yuma, 124 Ariz. 225, 603 P.2d 117 (App.1979).
In November 1988, Lane Justus (Justus) acquired title to 19 parcels of real property located in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Vulcan Materials Co. v. Bee ConstructionIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
- Employer's Liability Assurance Corporation v. LuntArizona Supreme Court · 1957
- Auto-Owners Insurance v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
- Peabody Coal Co. v. Navajo CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1977
- Vulcan Materials Co. v. Bee Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mid America Title Company v. Transnation Title Insurance Company, Cross-Appellee, and Landamerica Financial Group, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Mid America Title v. Transnation TitleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- TBS Properties LLC v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022