Legal Opinion

Frederiksen v. LaFleur

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1981No. 17121PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OAKS, Justice:

This is an action to quiet title to a plot of land. Plaintiffs are the record owners, and defendants are the purchasers under a tax deed. From a judgment quieting title in plaintiffs, defendants appeal. The issue on appeal is the applicability of the short statute of limitations designed to protect tax titles, and its relationship to the statutory requirements for adverse possession. All statutory citations are to Utah Code Annotated, 1953.

The disputed property is a vacant lot. Neither party has constructed any improvements or performed any work on it at any time material to…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hood River County v. DabneyOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Tintic Undine Mining Co. v. ErcanbrackUtah Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Churchill v. . OnderdonkNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  4. Sears v. County of CalaverasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. O'Grady v. BarnhiselCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Olwell v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Marchant v. Park CityUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Shelledy v. LoreUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Jensen v. Intermountain Healthcare, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Dillman v. FosterUtah Supreme Court · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API