Cooley v. Bettigole
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
The plaintiffs are either physicians or dentists who occupy offices in two of the three office buildings owned and operated by the defendant at Nos. 110, 120 and 130 Maple Street in Springfield. Both bills seek declaratory and other relief with respect to the defendant’s right (if any) to charge patients visiting the plaintiffs’ offices for the use of automobile parking facilities which lie to the rear of all three buildings. The separate bill brought by the plaintiff Cooley, which was first in point of time, also seeks an injunction against the defendant’s evicting that plaintiff from an…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Wellesley College v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Boston Housing Authority v. HemingwayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Robert Industries, Inc. v. SpenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Stoops v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Pittsfield & North Adams Railroad v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Edwin R. Sage Co. v. FoleyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
- Bendetson v. CoolidgeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
- Northern Associates, Inc. v. KileyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
- Air Plum Island, Inc. v. Society for the Preservation of New England AntiquitiesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
- DiBella v. FiumaraMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.