Legal Opinion
Robert Industries, Inc. v. Spence
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided January 5, 1973PublishedCited by 186 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBraucher, J.
The plaintiff filed two bills in the Superior Court. The first sought an accounting for the interference by the defendant Spence, through the defendant corporations controlled by him, with a right granted to the plaintiff by the Metropolitan District Commission (MDC). The second sought a declaration that a lease from the MDC to the plaintiff gave the plaintiff an exclusive right to serve food for money on George’s Island in Boston Harbor and also sought an injunction against such activity on the part of Spence and his corporations. One of the defendant corporations in the first suit,-…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Stoops v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Quintin Vespa Co. Inc. v. Construction Service Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
- Carlo Bianchi & Co. v. Builders' Equipment & Supplies Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
- Goldenberg v. TaglinoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Smith v. Vose & Sons Piano Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by186 opinions
- USM Corp. v. Arthur D. Little Systems, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
- Nasco, Inc. v. Public Storage, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Lohnes v. Level 3 Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Seaco Insurance v. BarbosaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- Kobayashi v. Orion Ventures, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
181 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.