Legal Opinion

Baker v. Loves Park Savings & Loan Ass'n

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1975No. 46999PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ryan

The plaintiffs, Richard E. Baker and Laurie J. Baker, executed a promissory note dated March 5, 1967, payable to the defendant, Loves Park Savings and Loan Association. The note was for $15,700 with interest at 6 percent per annum and provided for monthly installment payments of $102. The note was secured by a mortgage on property improved with a single-family residence owned by the plaintiffs. Section A(8)(d) of the mortgage provides :

“A. THE MORTGAGOR COVENANTS DURING THE TERM OF THIS MORTGAGE:

* * *(8) Not to suffer or permit without the written permission or consent of the mortgagee being…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Coast Bank v. MinderhoutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Tucker v. Lassen Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Malouff v. Midland Federal Savings and Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  4. Tucker v. Pulaski Federal Savings & Loan AssociationSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  5. Gunther v. WhiteTennessee Supreme Court · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Sonny Arnold, Inc. v. Sentry Savings Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Crockett v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Occidental Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Venco PartnershipNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
  4. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Asia Pulp & Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  5. Continental Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. FetterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API