Legal Opinion

Allen v. Allen

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 7, 1952PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNny, J.

The affidavit, summons, and pleadings of the plaintiff are not set forth in the transcript of the record, docketed in this Court, as required by Rule 19, sec. 1, of our Rules of Practice, 221 N.C. at page 553. The pleadings are an essential part of the record in order that we may be advised as to the nature of the action or proceeding. Insurance Co. v. Bullard, 207 N.C. 652, 178 S.E. 113.

Moreover, in a summary proceeding in ejectment the “oath in writing,” required by G.S. 42-28, must allege certain essential facts in order to confer jurisdiction. Howell v. Branson, 226 N.C. 264, 37 S.E. 2d…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pruitt v. WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. Pruitt v. . WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. Riggan v. . HarrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  4. Waters v. . WatersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  5. State v. Ravensford Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mooneyham v. MooneyhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  2. Macon v. MurraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. State v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API