Macon v. Murray
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Pee. Cueiam.
As the pleadings on which the case was tried have been omitted from the record, in violation of the requirements of Rule 19, Section 1 of the Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 221 N.C. 544, at page 553, the appeal must be dismissed in accordance with the uniform practice in such cases. See S. v. Lumber Co., 207 N.C. 47, 175 S.E. 713, and cases cited. See also Ins. Co. v. Bullard, 207 N.C. 652, 178 S.E. 113; Goodman v. Goodman, 208 N.C. 416, 181 S.E. 328; Bank v. McCullers, 211 N.C. 327, 190 S.E. 217; Washington County v. Land Co., 222 N.C. 637, 24 S.E. 2d 338; Ericson v.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. Ravensford Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- State v. JenkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Ericson v. . EricsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Goodman v. . GoodmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- Washington County v. Norfolk Southern Land Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Griffin v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Thrush v. ThrushSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956