Legal Opinion

Waters v. . Waters

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 5, 1930PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStact, C. J.

It appearing that each party was granted full and ample opportunity to present his contentions, both as to the law and the facts, no error can be imputed to the trial court in submitting the matter to the jury on a single issue. Potato Co. v. Jeanette, 174 N. C., 236, 93 S. E., 795.

Furthermore, it is provided by Rule 19, sec. 1, of the Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court that “the pleadings on which the case is tried, the issues and the judgment appealed from shall be a part of the transcript in all cases.” 192 N. C., p. 847. No summons or complaint appears in the record, hence we are not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. America Potato Co. v. Jeanette Bros.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  2. J. O. Plott Co. v. H. K. Ferguson Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Riggan v. . HarrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  2. State v. Ravensford Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  3. State v. . GoldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  4. Ericson v. . EricsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  5. Goodman v. . GoodmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API