Legal Opinion

Revell v. City of Muskogee

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 7, 1913No. 2491PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from District Court, Wagoner County; John H. King, Judge. Action by the City of Muskogee against O. D. Revell and others. Judgment for defendants, and from an order granting plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

AMES-, C.

This is a proceeding by the city of Muskogee against O. D. Revell and others to condemn an alley between and parallel with Broadway and Okmulgee avenues, and running from Third Street west; a part of the ground taken being a part of lot 2 of the block and the remainder a part of lot 3. Lots 2 and 3 belonged to different owners, although some of the number were owners of undivided interests in both lots. Upon the trial the jury returned a verdict against the city for $7,500. The city filed a motion for a new trial, which was granted. The appeal is taken by the owners from…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sharp v. Choctaw Ry. & Lighting Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Tulsa v. CreekmoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Grand River Dam Authority v. Grand-HydroSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Grand-Hydro v. Grand River Dam AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  4. Incorporated Town of Sallisaw v. PriestSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Idaho Farm Development Co. v. BrackettIdaho Supreme Court · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API