Legal Opinion

Idaho Farm Development Co. v. Brackett

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1923PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMccarthy, J.

Appellant is an irrigation company in Twin Falls county. By means of a reservoir it stores the waters of Cedar Creek and tributary streams. In the construction of the reservoir it became necessary to acquire by condemnation two parcels of land, one belonging to respondents Ira and Sarah Brackett, and the other to respondents Frank and Inez Clark. The Brackett lands comprise 320 acres, of whieh appellant sought to acquire 262.1. The Clark lands comprise 210 acres, of which appellant sought to acquire 108.8. This action is one for condemnation of these lands. The court having determined all the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. City of New York v. SageSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Sacramento Etc. R.R. Co. v. HeilbronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Alloway v. NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Christianson v. King CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Ex Parte KarstendickSupreme Court of the United States · 1876

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. MossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  2. City of Stockton v. EllingwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. State Ex Rel. Rich v. Dunclick, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Canyon View Irrigation Co. v. Twin Falls Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Sacramento & San Joaquin Drainage District v. JarvisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API