Legal Opinion

Grand-Hydro v. Grand River Dam Authority

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 27, 1943No. 30447PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIBSON, V. C. J.

This is an appeal by the condemnee from the judgment of the district court of Mayes county rendered on a verdict in condemnation proceedings.

The proceedings were instituted by Grand River Dam Authority, a corporate instrumentality of the state, against Grand-Hydro, a corporation, to condemn some 1,400 acres of land located in the Grand River valley. The commissioners appointed by the court awarded Grand-Hydro the sum of $281,802.74, whereupon said corporation filed its objections thereto and demanded a jury trial. Thereafter said Authority also filed its objections, and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. United States v. Boston, C. C. & N. Y. Canal Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1921
  3. City of Tulsa v. CreekmoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Public Service Co. v. LeatherbeeIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Grand River Dam Authority v. Grand-HydroSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Oklahoma Water Resources Board v. Central Oklahoma Master Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  2. Grand River Dam Authority v. Grand-HydroSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. State Ex Rel. State Insurance Fund v. BoneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  4. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union 976 v. Grand River Dam AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  5. Ruth E. Teague v. Grand River Dam AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API