Franklin Life Insurance v. State Board of Equalization
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.
Asserting the unconstitutionality of the retaliatory tax statute (Ins. Code, § 685) or, in the alternative, its unconstitutional application in the instant case, plaintiff Franklin Life Insurance Company (hereinafter called the Company) sought unsuccessfully in the trial court to recover taxes assessed by defendant State Board of Equalization (hereinafter called the Board). More specifically, the Company contends: (1) the retaliatory tax statute conflicts with the constitutional provision authorizing the retaliatory tax,- (2) the Board improperly computed the retaliatory tax imposed upon the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Aptheker v. Secretary of StateSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Prudential Insurance v. BenjaminSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Western & Southern Life Ins. Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Blair v. PitchessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- San Francisco Unified School District v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- People v. GrubbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.