Legal Opinion

Lummer v. Unruh

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 3, 1914No. Civ. No. 1581PublishedCited by 11 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order refusing a new trial. C. A. Raker, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

Action to quiet title to real estate. Judgment went for defendants, from which, and an order denying his motion for a new trial,-plaintiff prosecutes this appeal.

Defendant Unruh was sued as executor of the last will and testament of Elias J. Baldwin, deceased, who died March 1, 1909, and defendants Stocker and McClaughry were sued as the residuary legatees under the will of said deceased, all of whom, with the other defendants named, it is alleged, claim some interest, right, or title to the property in dispute.

The land involved, comprising 80.35 acres, is situated in and constitutes a part…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ricard v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1822
  2. Maxwell Land Grant Co. v. DawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Fletcher v. FullerSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. Hawkins v. Barney's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
  5. Reusens v. LawsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sorensen v. CostaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Marks v. ReissingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  3. Unruh v. LummerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  4. Jacoby v. WolffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Smith v. Royal Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API