Unruh v. Lummer
California Court of Appeal
APPEALS from judgments of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from orders refusing a new trial in each of the above entitled actions. C. A. Raker, Judge presiding. The facts are similar to those stated in the opinion in Lummer v. Unruh, ante, p. 97.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The above entitled actions grew out of the fact that defendant therein claimed ownership by adverse user to certain lands the title to which was involved in the case of Lummer v. Unruh et al., (Civ. No. 1581), ante, p. 97, [142 Pac. 914], an opinion in which on appeal to this court was this day filed, affirming a judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of defendants therein.
During the trial of said ease of Lummer v. TJnruh, it was stipulated in open court by the attorneys for the respective parties that the above entitled actions should abide and be controlled by the determination of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lummer v. UnruhCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
3Cited by30 opinions
- Goldsmith v. SalkeyTexas Supreme Court · 1938
- Boone v. BooneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
- Griffin v. GriffinOregon Supreme Court · 1920
- Helton v. CrawleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
- Spratt v. SprattSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.