Sager v. GAB Business Services, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtBieluch, J.
The defendant1 appeals from the judgment of the compensation review division dismissing its appeal as untimely under the regulations of Connecticut state agencies § 31-301-2. The defendant claims *694that the compensation review division (1) deprived it of due process of law, (2) exceeded its statutory authority, (3) erred in its interpretation of § 31-301-2 of the regulations, and (4) acted illegally, therefore rendering its decision void and of no effect, because it failed to adopt regulations on the dismissal of appeals despite a statutory directive to do so.
The facts are not in dispute. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- LaReau v. ReinckeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Zoning Board of Appeals v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Council on Probate Judicial Conduct re: KinsellaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- In re Carl O.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- City of Hartford v. PowersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Tedesco v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Stec v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- City of Middletown v. von MahlandConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Robinson v. Gwozdz, No. Fa95-0619118 (Feb. 22, 2001)Connecticut Superior Court · 2001
- Stec v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2009