Legal Opinion

City of Middletown v. von Mahland

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 21, 1994No. 12277PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

The defendant state board of mediation and arbitration (arbitration board)1 appeals from the trial court’s judgment granting the motion by the plaintiff city of Middletown to compel the named defendant, William von Mahland, to testify as a witness in the underlying arbitration proceeding.2 The arbitration board claims that the trial court improperly (1) held that a subpoenaed witness had a due process right to have his attorney present during his testimony in an arbitration proceeding, (2) ruled in violation, of § 31-91-34 (a) of the Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies,3 and (3) ruled…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Phoenix Windows, Inc. v. Viking Construction, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  2. Robinson v. Gwozdz, No. Fa95-0619118 (Feb. 22, 2001)Connecticut Superior Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API