Legal Opinion
Stec v. Raymark Industries, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 28, 2009No. AC 29346PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRUENDEL, J.
This case calls on us to address an unresolved area of workers’ compensation procedure. Specifically, we must determine whether the filing of an appeal from the decision of a compensation commissioner to the workers’ compensation review board (board) outside of the statutoiy time period for filing such an appeal deprives the board of subject matter jurisdiction. Put another way, we must decide whether an appellee can waive timeliness of filing a workers’ compensation appeal.
In Dechio v. Raymark Industries, Inc., 114 Conn. App. 58, 968 A.2d 450 (2009), also decided today, we…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Doe v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Ambroise v. William Raveis Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Dowling v. SlotnikSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Turner v. ScanlonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Sheff v. O'NeillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Stec v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Dechio v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- JP Morgan Chase Bank v. GIANOPOULOSConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Ross v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Shaw v. FreemanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.