Legal Opinion
LaReau v. Reincke
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 25, 1969PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHouse, J.
These three eases, although unrelated, are considered together because of the identity of the issues presented by the defendant’s motion, in each case, to dismiss the plaintiff’s appeal to this court from the denial by the Superior Court of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus.
In each case the plaintiff had been convicted of a crime and thereafter instituted habeas corpus proceedings to obtain his release from prison. In each case the application for the writ was denied, and each plaintiff, pursuant to § 52-470 of the General Statutes, obtained from the judge before whom his case was tried…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Adams v. RubinowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- STATE BAR ASSN. v. Connecticut Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Fredericks v. ReinckeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Philadelphia Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Heiser v. Morgan Guaranty Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Kelley v. BonneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Ambroise v. William Raveis Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Sullivan v. Board of Police CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. ReidSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Demar v. Open Space & Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.