Legal Opinion
Armitage v. City of Emporia, Kan.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided January 2, 1992No. 90-1222-KPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PATRICK F. KELLY, District Judge.
This matter is before the court for decision following a bench trial held on October 15 and 16, 1991.
The plaintiffs in this case are present and former detectives in the investigations section of the City of Emporia Police Department. The plaintiffs contend the defendant, the City of Emporia (City), violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., by failing to compensate them for lunch periods and for time spent while on call.
Plaintiffs seek declaratory judgment, compensation and liquidated damages for the unpaid…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Marshall v. BrunnerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Brinkman v. Department of Corrections of KansasDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1992
- Burnison v. Memorial Hospital, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1993
- Air Logistics of Alaska, Inc. v. ThroopAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
- McIntyre v. Division of Youth Rehabilitation Services, Department of Services for Children, Youth & Their FamiliesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1992
- Gilliam v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.