Legal Opinion
Gilliam v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided January 8, 1996No. Civil Action 2:94cv1006PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JACKSON, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Mitchell moves this Court for an award of liquidated damages, attorneys’ fees, and costs pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) (1994). The issue of liquidated damages arises because the Court ruled as a matter of law that the position of Loss Prevention Manager (“LPM”) in the stores of Defendant Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc. (“Montgomery Ward”) is not exempt from the requirements of the FLSA to pay overtime compensation. 1 The Court held a hearing on November 8, 1995 2 on the issue of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Plyler v. EvattCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Service News CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- Karen Trimper v. City of Norfolk, Virginia Henry P. HensonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Air Logistics of Alaska, Inc. v. ThroopAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
- McDonnell v. Miller Oil Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1997
- North Carolina Alliance for Transportation Reform, Inc. v. United States Department of TransportationDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2001
- Muston v. MKI Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1997
- NC ALLIANCE FOR TRANSP. v. US Dept. of Transp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2001