Legal Opinion
Fidelity Bank v. Krenisky
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 1, 2002No. AC 21862PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FOTI, J.
In this foreclosure action, the defendants, John M. Krenisky and Frances G. Krenisky, appeal from *702the summary judgment as to liability rendered by the trial court in favor of the plaintiff, Fidelity Bank. On appeal, the defendants claim that the court improperly (1) granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment by concluding that their special defenses were legally insufficient and (2) struck their six count counterclaim.1 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.On April 3, 1987, the defendants executed a promissory note payable to the order of Connecticut Bank and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Novametrix Medical Systems, Inc. v. BOC Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Lauer v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Collins v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Hartford Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. TuckerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, Etc. v. BeauvaisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Green Tree Servicing, LLC v. MilamDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- GMAC Mortgage, LLC v. FordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Keller v. BeckensteinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Barasso v. Rear Still Hill Road, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.