State v. Hollars
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtSharp, J.
Defendant’s first assignment of error is to the failure of the court to sustain his plea of former jeopardy. He argues that, since the State failed to protect his constitutional rights in the first trial of these two cases, the court could not again try him for the same offense. The judge correctly denied this plea; this contention has heretofore been decided against defendant. State v. Gainey, 265 N.C. 437, 144 S.E. 2d 249; State v. Anderson, 262 N.C. 491, 137 S.E. 2d 823; State v. White, 262 N.C. 52, 136 S.E. 2d 205.
Defendant next assigns as error the court’s denial of his motion that he be…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- State v. LowrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- State v. PattonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- State v. . WebbSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Buggs v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. McQueenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. SpencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. DietzSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.