State v. Johnson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtSharp, J.
Defendant’s first assignment of error is that the trial judge erred in overruling his motion to dismiss this prosecution because he had been denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial. The facts upon which defendant bases this motion are not in dispute:
On 1 November 1963, the seventh day after the robbery, Sheriff Womble obtained warrants charging Johnson and McCoy with the crime. At that time Johnson and McCoy were in jail in Wilson County, charged with having committed during the week of the Nash County robbery four other armed robberies, one in Edgecombe County and three in Wilson…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Pollard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Beavers v. HaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Howard Ross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by120 opinions
- State v. McQueenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. SpencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Simeon v. HardinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.