City of Los Angeles v. Abbott
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.
In an action in eminent domain instituted by the City of Los Angeles, a municipal corporation, wherein the respondent was, among others, named as a defendant, all proceedings and expenditures of moneys were subsequently enjoined by the decree of a co-ordinate court in another suit. Respondent thereafter moved to dismiss this action as though the same had been abandoned, within the purview of sections 1255 and 1255a of the Code of Civil Procedure. Said motion was granted, and he thereupon filed a “memorandum of costs and disbursements”, which included an item entitled “attorneys’ fees…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Dikes v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1859
- City of Los Angeles v. AbbottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Cassell v. CrothersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
- McIntyre v. TrautnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Foley v. California Horseshoe Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Oak Grove School District v. City Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Martineau v. State Conservation CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- People Ex Rel. Mosk v. BarenfeldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- County of Kern v. GalatasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Decoto School District v. M. & S. Tile Co.California Court of Appeal · 1964
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.