McIntyre v. Trautner
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an. order of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco striking out a certain item from a cost-bill. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.
The appellant brought this action against the respondent to foreclose a mechanic’s lien for plumbing work. The court rendered judgment of nonsuit against him. He appealed to this court, and the case was reversed and remanded for a new trial. (McIntyre v. Trautner, 63 Cal. 429.) Upon the return of the case to the court below he filed his cost-bill, including as one of the items of costs the sum of two hundred dollars for his attorney’s fees in the supreme court. The court, on motion of the respondent, made an order striking out and disallowing this item of costs. Subsequently the case…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Rapp v. Spring Valley Gold Co.California Supreme Court · 1888
- McIntyre v. TrautnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
3Cited by42 opinions
- Newport v. HattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- City of Los Angeles v. AbbottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- In Re Adoption of PrattSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- In Re Estate of SankeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Wortman v. KleinschmidtMontana Supreme Court · 1892
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.