Legal Opinion

Sze v. Bloch

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 27, 1972No. 8697PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Almond, Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Patent Interferences awarding priority to appellee, Godfrey Bloch, on the ground that appellant, Benjamin Chiatse Sze, cannot make the counts in issue.

The three counts in issue correspond to claims of the Bloch patent,1 which were copied by Sze in his application.2 After Sze copied the claims from the Bloch patent, a first interference was set up.3 Bloch then moved to dissolve the interference on the ground that Sze could not make the counts. The primary examiner granted this motion, dissolved the interference,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Myers v. FeigelmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  2. Robert L. Dreyfus and John W. Harrison v. Martin M. SternauCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
  3. Richard F. Dyer v. Frederick C. Field, Jr.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  4. In re ErnstCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  5. Swengel v. BurkigCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Albert R. Martin v. Ferdy P. MayerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  2. Squires v. CorbettCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
  3. Gordon Gould v. Gerald J. Mossinghoff, Honorable Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks, in His Official CapacityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  4. Wetmore v. QuickCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
  5. Holmes v. KellyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API