Legal Opinion

Swengel v. Burkig

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 2, 1972No. 8626PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Almond, Judge.

This is an appeal by the senior party Swengel from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Patent Interferences awarding priority in interference No. 95,848 ■ to Burkig and Richardson (Burkig), the junior. party. In issue are two counts corresponding to claims of a Burkig patent,1 copied by Swengel in his application.2

The subject matter in issue is a grid of interconnected electrical conductors suitable for use in interconnecting electrical components, such as- micro-size elements, in selected' different circuit networks. A particular network is obtained by severing selected…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. John Sherman Smith v. Charles Emory WehnCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  2. Louis H. Segall v. Marion W. Sims, Ezra C. Hill and Aaron M. KrakowerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
  3. Beecham Products, Inc. v. Hawaiian Perfumers, Inc., D.B.A. Liana of WaikikiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sze v. BlochCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API