Legal Opinion

Richard F. Dyer v. Frederick C. Field, Jr.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 14, 1967No. Patent Appeal 7815PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WORLEY, Chief Judge.

The sole issue raised by Dyer 1 in his appeal from the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences awarding priority of invention to Field 2 is whether, as the board held, Field is entitled under 35 U.S.C. § 120 to rely upon the 1954 filing date of his parent application to establish priority with respect to the subject matter of the single count:

1. A bulky yarn comprising a separate core yarn and separate excess yarn interwoven back and forth in said core yarn, said excess yarn at a number of random points extending through said core yarn and forming a multitude of…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brand v. ThomasCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938
  2. Hugh Cecil Binstead and Henry James Stockwell v. Hans Littmann and Brüno MüllerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
  3. Charles B. Swain and Albert G. Schuessler v. Bob C. CrittendonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gilbert P. Hyatt v. Gary W. BooneCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  2. Application of Klaus HafnerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  3. Bayer AG v. Schein Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  4. Robert N. Noyce v. Jack St. Clair Kilby, Jack St. Clair Kilby v. Robert N. NoyceCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  5. Sze v. BlochCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API