Richard F. Dyer v. Frederick C. Field, Jr.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
WORLEY, Chief Judge.
The sole issue raised by Dyer 1 in his appeal from the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences awarding priority of invention to Field 2 is whether, as the board held, Field is entitled under 35 U.S.C. § 120 to rely upon the 1954 filing date of his parent application to establish priority with respect to the subject matter of the single count:
1. A bulky yarn comprising a separate core yarn and separate excess yarn interwoven back and forth in said core yarn, said excess yarn at a number of random points extending through said core yarn and forming a multitude of…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Brand v. ThomasCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938
- Hugh Cecil Binstead and Henry James Stockwell v. Hans Littmann and Brüno MüllerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
- Charles B. Swain and Albert G. Schuessler v. Bob C. CrittendonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gilbert P. Hyatt v. Gary W. BooneCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Application of Klaus HafnerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- Bayer AG v. Schein Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Robert N. Noyce v. Jack St. Clair Kilby, Jack St. Clair Kilby v. Robert N. NoyceCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- Sze v. BlochCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.