Legal Opinion

Detroit Tug & Wrecking Co. v. Gartner

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1889PublishedCited by 38 opinions

Application for mandamus to compel respondent to grant a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

Application for mandamus to compel the circuit judge to grant a new trial.

The granting or refusing of a motion for a new trial is a matter which rests in the discretion of the trial court. It is so clearly so that it is conceded that this Court has no jurisdiction to interfere with the decision of the circuit court, except it be to correct an abuse of the discretion exercised by it.

To warrant this Court in interfering in matters so entirely in the sound discretion of the circuit court as the granting or refusing of a new trial, the abuse of discretion ought to be so plain that, upon…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. LIFE AND FIRE INS. COMPANY OF NEW YORK v. Wilson's HeirsSupreme Court of the United States · 1834
  2. Gray v. BartonMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  3. United States v. LawrenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1795
  4. Ex Parte Jesse HoytSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  5. Ex Parte Myra Clarke WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1839

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Alken-Ziegler, Inc. v. Waterbury Headers Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. People v. BuieMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Grist v. Upjohn CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Cooper v. CarrMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API