Alken-Ziegler, Inc. v. Waterbury Headers Corp.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Per curiam
We must decide in this contract action whether the circuit court abused its discretion in denying the motion by defendant Waterbury Headers Corporation to set aside the default entered because of its failure to respond to the plaintiffs summons and complaint. We hold that the circuit court did not abuse its discretion, and we thus reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals.
i
Plaintiff Alken-Ziegler, Inc., manufactures cold-formed steel products at its factory in Kalkaska. In May 1991, the plaintiff contracted with Waterbury Headers, Inc., of Connecticut to convert one of the plaintiffs…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Spalding v. SpaldingMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Wendel v. SwanbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
- Bigelow v. WalravenMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- White v. SadlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Williams v. Hofley Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1988
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- Gilbert v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. CressMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
- Saffian v. SimmonsMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
- People of Michigan v. Kendrick ScottMichigan Supreme Court · 2018
- Rental Properties Owners Ass'n v. Kent County TreasurerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.