Legal Opinion

LIFE AND FIRE INS. COMPANY OF NEW YORK v. Wilson's Heirs

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 18, 1834PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice M’Lean

In the argument, on the motion to make the rule for a mandamus absolute, various objections were taken against the jurisdiction of the district court.

It is insisted that the plaintiffs, in their corporate capacity, can neither make a contract in Louisiana, nor enforce it in that state by suit; and if they could, the proceedings in the case were erroneous, and might be reversed on a writ of error.

In the consideration of the question now before the court, they do not consider themselves authorised to examine into the regularity of the proceedings in the case before the district court, as they…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. The United States v. DanielSupreme Court of the United States · 1821

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. Ex Parte United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. United States Ex Rel. Arant v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. In Re Pennsylvania Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Reeside v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  5. Barber Asphalt Pav. Co. v. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API