People v. Buie
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMarkman, J.
We granted leave to appeal to consider whether witness testimony taken by two-way, interactive video was properly admitted during defendant’s trial. Our consideration implicates two issues: (1) whether defendant’s constitutional right to be confronted with the witnesses against him was violated by the admission of video testimony, US Const, Am VI; Const 1963, art 1, § 20, and (2) whether the admission of video testimony violated MCR 6.006(C). Because we conclude that defendant waived his right of confrontation under the United States and Michigan Constitutions and that the court rule was not…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- People v. Jackson (On Reconsideration)Michigan Court of Appeals · 2015
- People v. HenryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
- Aft Michigan v. State of MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 2015
- People v. BuieMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
- People v. FawazMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.