State v. Howard
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
FRYE, Justice.
Defendant brings forward several assignments of error. Three assignments involve evidentiary rulings made by the trial court that defendant contends are prejudicial to him. Next, defendant contends the trial court committed prejudicial error when it permitted direct questioning of a witness by a juror. Finally, he contends the trial court erred in permitting the prosecutor to note in closing argument that defendant failed to call any alibi witnesses, which defendant contends impermissibly shifts the burden of proof to him.
We hold that defendant received a fair trial free of…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- State v. RiddickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. KennedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. RameySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. HigginbottomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- State v. FisherOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. WeeksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- State v. JenningsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
- State v. McDowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- Commonwealth v. BrittoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.