Legal Opinion

State v. Howard

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 7, 1987No. 12A87PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRYE, Justice.

Defendant brings forward several assignments of error. Three assignments involve evidentiary rulings made by the trial court that defendant contends are prejudicial to him. Next, defendant contends the trial court committed prejudicial error when it permitted direct questioning of a witness by a juror. Finally, he contends the trial court erred in permitting the prosecutor to note in closing argument that defendant failed to call any alibi witnesses, which defendant contends impermissibly shifts the burden of proof to him.

We hold that defendant received a fair trial free of…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. State v. RiddickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. State v. KennedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  3. State v. RameySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  5. State v. HigginbottomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. State v. FisherOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. WeeksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  3. State v. JenningsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  4. State v. McDowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  5. Commonwealth v. BrittoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API