State v. Weeks

FRYE, Justice.

Defendant brings forward nineteen assignments of error, seven of which involve court rulings concerning jury voir dire. De fendant contends also that the trial court violated his right to due process when it ordered him to submit to a second psychiatric evaluation. He next assigns error to six evidentiary rulings made during the trial. Defendant contends also that the trial court erred by refusing to permit the jury to consider possible verdicts of voluntary manslaughter. Next, he argues that the trial court erred in submitting the possible verdict of first degree murder under…