Legal Opinion

Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Penn

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1962No. A-8984PublishedCited by 329 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALKER, Justice.

This is a summary judgment proceeding. The Youngstown Sheet and Tube Company, petitioner, brought suit against Texita Oil Company on a sworn account and for foreclosure of materialmen’s liens on the Mallard “A” and Mallard “B” leases in Atascosa County. Petitioner’s claim is for labor and materials which it furnished to Texita. The second amended original petition alleged that Texita was a partnership composed of Gordon W. Johnson, I. A. McNab, Morris Cannan, Henry W. Penn, J. K. Stark, and J. P. Hale. It was also alleged that the defendants were partners in the development…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Womack v. Allstate Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Gardner v. MartinTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Box v. BatesTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Moody v. SmootTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Mark Whelan v. New Mexico Western Oil and Gas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by329 opinions

  1. Swilley v. HughesTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  2. M.O. Dental Lab v. RapeTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Elizondo v. City of San Antonio, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
  4. Life Insurance Co. of Virginia v. Gar-Dal, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Well Solutions, Inc. v. Stafford, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2000

324 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API