Legal Opinion

New York Underwriters Insurance Co. v. Sanchez

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1990No. D-0046PublishedCited by 311 opinions

1Per curiam

This application presents the jurisdictional problem of an attempted appeal from an interlocutory trial court order. Because the lack of appellate jurisdiction is fundamental error, we grant the application, reverse the judgment of the court of appeals, and render judgment as the court of appeals should have, dismissing the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Raul Sanchez brought the present action against New York Underwriters and David Sampson, the company claims agent handling his worker’s compensation claim, for breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing. Sanchez further alleged he was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. North East Independent School District v. AldridgeTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  2. McCauley v. Consolidated UnderwritersTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Teer v. DuddlestenTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Long v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Sanchez v. New York Underwriters Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1990

3Cited by311 opinions

  1. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Usaa Texas Lloyds Company v. Gail MenchacaTexas Supreme Court · 2018
  3. M.O. Dental Lab v. RapeTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  4. McNally v. GuevaraTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Welch v. McDougal, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1994

306 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API