Moyer v. Wilson
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Charles Lantz, W. J. Wood, Davis, Lantz & Wood, and Louis Luckel, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
Action to quiet title to a lot in the county of Los Angeles. The court found that the defendant Lillie E. Wilson was the owner of said lot and that plaintiff had no title or interest therein. Judgment in favor of defendant followed. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
It is conceded that the defendant was the owner of the property, unless the title of her predecessor in interest had been divested by delinquent tax proceedings culminating in a deed from the state to the plaintiff. After plaintiff had introduced said deed in evidence, the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Holland v. HotchkissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Miller v. County of KernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Miller v. County of KernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Steele v. County of San Luis ObispoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Henderson v. WardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Routh v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Telonis v. StaleyUtah Supreme Court · 1943
- Green v. De Los PalmerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Coleman v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Joslin v. ShafferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.