Legal Opinion

Henderson v. Ward

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 20, 1913No. Civ. No. 1279PublishedCited by 12 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order refusing a new trial. Charles Monroe, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

This action was brought by plaintiff to secure a decree determining title to a certain town lot in the county of Los Angeles to be in the heirs of plaintiff’s intestate. Defendant’s asserted title was based upon a certain deed issued by the tax-collector of the county of Los Angeles following proceedings had upon an alleged sale to the state of the property mentioned for delinquent taxes in the year 1895. It was stipulated between the parties at the commencement of the trial that plaintiff’s intestate at the time of his death was the owner in fee of the lot referred to, unless such title had…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Couts v. CornellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Miller v. County of KernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Smith v. FurlongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Miller v. County of KernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Healton v. MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Moyer v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Harrington v. McLeanMontana Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Telonis v. StaleyUtah Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Brady v. BostwickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  5. Carroll v. BostwickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API